Some housing supporters don't want a housing bond
A small win this year might prevent a big win in 2028.
Well, apparently not every housing advocate wants to put a housing bond on the ballot this year. Even though they are "dismayed" that city staff entirely neglected housing in its bond package recommendation, some believe it would be better to wait until 2028 to ask voters to approve more funding for subsidized housing.
Thanks to this week's sponsor:

Your business doesn't stand still, and neither should your legal team. From high-stakes business and real estate acquisitions to complex litigation, Bukowski Law Firm is built for leaders who demand more than just 'standard' representation. We serve as an extension of your management team, guarding your investments and clearing the path for your next big move. Discover a law firm that values your vision as much as you do. Where ambition meets results: bukowskilawfirm.com.
There are a couple different factors to consider.
One is that the city housing department has apparently offered convincing enough reassurances that the remaining dollars from the 2022 housing bond can be stretched until 2028.
The second is that some advocates would rather wait until 2028 for a big housing bond than settle for a small one this year.